DOJ Is Now Deputizing Local Prosecutors to Bring Federal Fraud Cases: What the National Fraud Enforcement Division's Special Attorneys Program Means for Florida Targets
Listen to Article
Part 1: Introduction
The National Fraud Enforcement Division and the $300 million Special Attorneys Program just widened the pool of prosecutors who can bring a federal fraud case against you.
If you run a medical practice, a pharmacy, a billing company, or any business that touches federal money in South Florida, the pool of prosecutors who can put you in front of a federal grand jury just got larger. In April 2026, the Justice Department stood up a new National Fraud Enforcement Division and, weeks later, opened $300 million in funding to deputize state, local, tribal, and territorial prosecutors as federal Special Attorneys inside it. That is a structural change in who charges federal fraud, not a press-release talking point.
- DOJ's new National Fraud Enforcement Division opened a $300 million Special Attorneys Program in April 2026 to fund state and local prosecutors as federal fraud prosecutors.
- Cross-designation runs through 28 U.S.C. § 515 and 28 U.S.C. § 543, the authorities that let non-DOJ lawyers exercise federal charging power.
- Core exposure statutes include 18 U.S.C. § 1347 (healthcare fraud), 18 U.S.C. § 1349 (conspiracy), and 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b (Anti-Kickback Statute).
- The Southern and Middle Districts of Florida are among the most active healthcare-fraud venues in the country, so the added capacity lands here first.
- Pre-indictment defense is where these cases are shaped, before a Special Attorney presents to the grand jury.

More prosecutors now hold federal fraud charging power, and they are being paid to use it. For providers and businesses touching federal money in South Florida, the odds of a federal look just went up.
Key Takeaways
- DOJ created the National Fraud Enforcement Division on April 7, 2026, and opened a $300 million Special Attorneys Program on April 22, 2026, to deputize state, local, tribal, and territorial prosecutors as federal fraud prosecutors.
- Cross-designation runs through 28 U.S.C. § 515 and 28 U.S.C. § 543, letting a state or local prosecutor exercise federal charging authority as a Special Attorney or Special Assistant United States Attorney.
- The exposure statutes have not changed: 18 U.S.C. § 1347 (healthcare fraud, up to 10 years per count), 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (wire fraud, up to 20 years), 18 U.S.C. § 1349 (conspiracy), and 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b (Anti-Kickback Statute).
- The Southern and Middle Districts of Florida are among the busiest healthcare-fraud venues in the country, so the added prosecutorial capacity lands here first.
- Pre-indictment defense is the only window to influence whether a case is charged federally and on what theory. That window closes the moment a Special Attorney walks the case into a grand jury.
What Actually Happened
On April 7, 2026, the Justice Department created the National Fraud Enforcement Division, a standalone litigating division built to prosecute fraud against taxpayer-funded programs, including Medicare and Medicaid. On April 22, 2026, the Department followed with a $300 million funding opportunity called the Special Attorneys Program. The money supports state, local, tribal, and territorial prosecuting agencies that designate qualified prosecutors to serve as Special Attorneys inside the new division or the Criminal Division, or as Special Assistant United States Attorneys inside a United States Attorney's Office.
In plain terms, a county or state prosecutor can now carry federal charging authority and work a federal fraud case alongside the Department. The stated priorities are fraud in federal benefit programs, benefits fraud tied to noncitizens, and drug and human trafficking. For a business owner or provider, the headline is simple. More prosecutors now hold the power to bring a federal fraud case, and they are being paid to do it.
What the Government Is Actually Building
This is a capacity play. Federal fraud units have always been limited by headcount. Cross-designation removes that ceiling by borrowing prosecutors from state and local offices and giving them federal authority for the case. The cross-designation tools are not new. 28 U.S.C. § 515 lets the Attorney General direct specially appointed attorneys to conduct any kind of legal proceeding, and 28 U.S.C. § 543 authorizes the appointment of attorneys to assist United States attorneys. What is new is the money and the mandate to use them at scale.
Expect more grand jury activity, more parallel state and federal coordination, and more cases that start in a local office and end in federal court. For providers and businesses in federal benefit programs, that means the odds of a federal look at conduct that used to draw only state attention just went up.

Exposure and Charges
The statutes have not changed, but who wields them has. Most fraud prosecutions this division will bring run through a familiar set. Healthcare fraud is charged under 18 U.S.C. § 1347, which carries up to 10 years per count, and up to 20 years if the fraud results in serious bodily injury. Wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1343 reaches 20 years per count. Conspiracy under 18 U.S.C. § 1349 lets the government charge the agreement itself, without proving the scheme succeeded. Kickback conduct is charged under the Anti-Kickback Statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b.
Sentencing turns on loss amount, and the government aggregates loss aggressively. A billing pattern the client viewed as routine can become a multimillion-dollar loss calculation once agents pull three years of claims data. That is why the number in the indictment often bears little resemblance to what the client thought was at stake.
Critical Mistakes People Make Early
The errors that sink these cases happen before anyone is charged. Talking to agents without counsel. Producing documents in response to a subpoena without a strategy or a privilege review. Assuming the matter is not serious because it started with a state or local prosecutor rather than an Assistant United States Attorney. Under this program, that assumption is now wrong.
Waiting for the indictment to hire a federal criminal defense attorney gives up the one window where the outcome is still fluid. By the time charges are filed, the government has already chosen its theory, built its loss number, and locked in its witnesses.

Strategic Defense Approach
Federal investigation defense is about the pre-indictment stage. Early intervention can mean the difference between a declination and an indictment. A federal criminal defense attorney who engages before charges can open a line to the prosecutor, present the client's side before the government commits to a theory, and challenge the loss calculation while it is still being built. If cooperation is on the table, it is worth more early than late. If the case is heading to litigation, the defense needs to control the document narrative from the first subpoena.
None of that is available once the grand jury has already returned an indictment. The added prosecutorial capacity from the Special Attorneys Program is a reason to move earlier, not later.
Why Timing Matters
Charging decisions are still open early in an investigation. That is the point of the Special Attorneys Program. Bring more cases, faster, with more prosecutors. The right response to more prosecutors is not more waiting. It is earlier defense work. The window to influence whether a case is charged federally, and on what theory, closes the moment a Special Attorney walks the case into the grand jury.
For anyone in South Florida who has received a target letter, a grand jury subpoena, or an agent visit, the time-sensitive move is to get counsel involved now, while the case is still being shaped.

"The window to influence whether a case is charged federally, and on what theory, closes the moment a Special Attorney walks the case into the grand jury."— Aaron M. Cohen, AMC Defense Law
Common Questions
South Florida providers and businesses ask the same questions once they understand what the Special Attorneys Program actually changed. The answers below cover the ones that come up first.

AMC Defense Law represents providers, executives, and business owners in federal investigations and prosecutions in Florida and nationwide, at the pre-indictment stage where the work matters most.
Facing a Federal Fraud Investigation in Florida?
AMC Defense Law represents providers, executives, and business owners in federal investigations and prosecutions, in Florida and nationwide. If you have received a target letter, a grand jury subpoena, or a visit from federal agents, a confidential consultation is the right first step. The firm handles federal healthcare fraud and white-collar matters at the pre-indictment stage, where the work matters most.
If you or your loved ones have been arrested or are under federal investigation in Florida or anywhere in the country, call Aaron M. Cohen, 24 hours a day to get help.
Listen to Article
Part 1: Introduction
The National Fraud Enforcement Division and the $300 million Special Attorneys Program just widened the pool of prosecutors who can bring a federal fraud case against you.

Aaron M. Cohen
Principal Attorney
Aaron M. Cohen is a nationally recognized criminal defense attorney with over 30 years of experience representing individuals and entities in complex criminal investigations and prosecutions across the United States.
View Attorney ProfileRelated Analysis
From Timeshares to Peptides: How Florida Became the Proving Ground for Federal Fraud Enforcement
Federal prosecutors have targeted Florida industries in waves for twenty years. If your sector is drawing attention now, the investigation started months ago -- here is what that history means for you.
When the Science Isn't There: How Peptide Marketing Claims Are Becoming the DOJ's Easiest Wire Fraud Cases
For peptide vendors, clinics, and telehealth platforms, marketing copy is the evidence federal prosecutors are using to convert FDCA violations into multi-count wire fraud indictments.
DME and Telemedicine Fraud: Why Physicians Are Now the Primary Federal Targets
DOJ charged 96 medical professionals in the 2025 takedown. The COVID telehealth boom created a paper trail prosecutors are now using against the doctors who signed.