Results

Victories That Rewrite the Odds

Proven results across all practice areas

Every case tells a story of strategic defense, relentless advocacy, and exceptional results. These are real cases with real outcomes that changed our clients' lives.

Federal Crimes
Complex Cases
  • • Wire & Mail Fraud
  • • Drug Conspiracies
  • • Firearms Offenses
  • • Public Corruption
State Felonies
Serious Charges
  • • Violent Crimes
  • • Theft & Fraud
  • • Sex Offenses
  • • Drug Crimes
Post-Conviction
Second Chances
  • • Sentence Modifications
  • • Probation Violations
  • • Appeals & Expungements

State v. A.A.S

Charge: DUI and Driving While License Suspended (DWLS)
Palm Beach County
December 2024
Worst Case Scenario:
1 year jail on each count (2 years total)
Actual Results:
DUI minimums with no jail time, significantly better than initial offer of 30 days jail

Arrested For:

DUI and Driving While License Suspended (DWLS)

What Was Done:

The defendant faced charges of Driving Under the Influence (DUI) and Driving While License Suspended (DWLS). The State initially offered a resolution of one year of probation and 30 days in jail.

Unique Approach:

Through skilled negotiation, our firm successfully resolved the case for DUI minimums without any jail time, achieving an outcome significantly more favorable than the State's initial offer.

State v. J.M

Charge: Sexual Offender Registration Violations
Palm Beach County
December 2024
Worst Case Scenario:
48 months minimum prison sentence
Actual Results:
Six months of community control (house arrest), avoiding any prison time

Arrested For:

Failure of Sexual Offender to Register and Providing False Information

What Was Done:

The client faced two serious charges, including failure to register as a sexual offender and providing false information, with a minimum potential sentence of 48 months in prison.

Unique Approach:

Developed comprehensive defense strategy to avoid prison sentence, successfully negotiating alternative to prison despite serious nature of charges and mandatory minimums.

State v. A.A

Charge: Grand Theft and Petit Theft
Martin County
December 2024
Worst Case Scenario:
6 years prison, with potential for 11 years due to prior offenses
Actual Results:
18-month sentence, avoiding potential 11-year maximum and 54-month offer

Arrested For:

Third-Degree Felony Grand Theft and First-Degree Misdemeanor Petit Theft

What Was Done:

The client, charged with Grand Theft and Petit Theft, faced a daunting legal battle given an extensive history of arrests and prior prison sentences. The State initially offered a sentence of 54 months.

Unique Approach:

Through strategic representation and an open plea to the court, our firm was able to avoid the Defendant being charged as a repeat offender warranting a 10-year prison term. Strategic open plea to court resulted in significantly reduced sentence.

United States v. E.L

Charge: Wire Fraud (4 Counts)
Middle District of North Carolina
2021
Worst Case Scenario:
20 years imprisonment and 3 years release on each count (potentially 80 years total)
Actual Results:
34 months imprisonment and 3 years supervised release

Arrested For:

Wire Fraud involving logistics companies

What Was Done:

A grand jury charged the defendant with devising a scheme to defraud two logistics companies by creating fraudulent shipper accounts to avoid paying shipping costs. The individual created fake accounts using the names of real companies without their knowledge, attempting to defraud companies out of more than 1.5 million dollars.

Unique Approach:

Successfully argued for concurrent sentences and significant reduction despite high-value fraud involving multiple corporate victims and fraudulent activities spanning over a year.

United States v. K.S

Charge: Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud
Southern District of Illinois (East St. Louis)
2016
Worst Case Scenario:
30 years imprisonment and 5 years supervised release
Actual Results:
1 Day Prison and 5 years supervised release

Arrested For:

Tech support scam operation defrauding thousands of consumers through deceptive internet pop-ups and fraudulent sales tactics

What Was Done:

The Defendant was employed by a tech support scam company that defrauded thousands of consumers through deceptive internet pop-ups and fraudulent sales tactics. The company falsely informed consumers of non-existent computer problems and convinced them to purchase unnecessary services and products. The individual worked as a salesperson and later as a team leader, instructing others in the fraudulent techniques. The scam operated from November 2013 to June 2016, defrauding over 40,000 people out of more than $25 million.

Unique Approach:

Despite the massive scale of the fraud involving 40,000 victims and $25 million in losses, and the defendant's leadership role in instructing others in fraudulent techniques, counsel managed to secure an extraordinarily lenient sentence of just one day in prison.

United States v. K.H

Charge: Possession with Intent to Distribute Cocaine
Southern District of Florida (West Palm Beach)
2016
Worst Case Scenario:
20 Years imprisonment with 3 years supervised release
Actual Results:
24 months imprisonment, 3 years of supervised release, avoiding additional firearms penalties

Arrested For:

Possession of More than 500 grams of cocaine with intent to distribute

What Was Done:

On March 4, 2016, Drug Enforcement Administration agents and Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office deputies executed a search warrant at a residence. Inside a safe, officers found approximately 1,997 grams of cocaine, cutting agents, drug packaging materials, drug paraphernalia, and $69,910 in United States currency. A loaded firearm was also found on a shelf in the same closet, above the safe.

Unique Approach:

The defense team was able to get all gun charges dropped after extensive motion practice, significantly reducing potential sentence and demonstrating exceptional motion practice in federal court.

United States v. S.B

Charge: Bank Fraud and Attempt and Conspiracy to Commit Mail Fraud
Southern District of Florida (Miami)
2015
Worst Case Scenario:
30 years imprisonment on each count
Actual Results:
Initial 21-month sentence reduced to 14 months with concurrent sentences on all counts via Rule 35 motion

Arrested For:

Complex mortgage fraud scheme involving bank fraud and conspiracy to commit mail fraud

What Was Done:

In this complex mortgage fraud case, the client initially faced a sentence of 21 months of imprisonment and 5 years of supervised release. The team meticulously examined the government's evidence, identified areas for negotiation, and presented compelling arguments to mitigate sentencing through intensive negotiation, strategic analysis of discovery materials, and proactive engagement with the U.S. Attorney's Office.

Unique Approach:

Recognizing the complexities of the case and the need to secure the best possible result, we successfully persuaded the government to file a motion under Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, demonstrating exceptional skill in federal criminal defense strategy and post-sentencing advocacy.

State v. J.M

Charge: Sexual Offender Registration Violations
Palm Beach County
2015
Worst Case Scenario:
48 months minimum prison sentence
Actual Results:
Six months of community control (house arrest), avoiding any prison time

Arrested For:

Failure of Sexual Offender to Register and Providing False Information

What Was Done:

Faced serious charges with significant mandatory minimum prison time. Developed comprehensive defense strategy to avoid prison sentence.

Unique Approach:

Successfully negotiated alternative to prison despite serious nature of charges and mandatory minimums.

State v. A.A

Charge: Grand Theft and Petit Theft
Martin County
2015
Worst Case Scenario:
6 years prison, with potential for 11 years due to prior offenses
Actual Results:
18-month sentence, avoiding potential 11-year maximum and 54-month offer

Arrested For:

Third-Degree Felony Grand Theft and First-Degree Misdemeanor Petit Theft

What Was Done:

Client had extensive criminal history with prior prison sentences. State initially offered 54 months.

Unique Approach:

Successfully avoided repeat offender enhancement that would have resulted in 10-year term. Strategic open plea to court resulted in significantly reduced sentence.

United States v. R.M

Charge: Coercion or Enticement of Female
Southern District of Florida (West Palm Beach)
2015
Worst Case Scenario:
Life imprisonment with 10-year minimum mandatory
Actual Results:
10 years imprisonment with 5 years supervised release, avoiding potential life sentence

Arrested For:

Attempted coercion and enticement of a minor for sexual activity

What Was Done:

Defendant was caught in undercover operation using private messenger service to contact who they believed was a minor, arriving with items intended for sexual activity.

Unique Approach:

Successfully negotiated for minimum sentence despite serious nature of charges and presence of physical evidence.

State v. A.A.S

Charge: DUI and DWLS
Palm Beach County
2015
Worst Case Scenario:
1 year jail on each count (2 years total)
Actual Results:
DUI minimums with no jail time, significantly better than initial offer

Arrested For:

DUI and Driving While License Suspended (DWLS)

What Was Done:

State initially offered one year of probation and 30 days in jail.

Unique Approach:

Successfully negotiated for minimum penalties without jail time through effective plea negotiations.

United States v. W.R

Charge: Possession of Controlled Substance
Southern District of Florida (West Palm Beach)
2015
Worst Case Scenario:
5-40 years on each count
Actual Results:
5 years imprisonment and 4 years supervised release

Arrested For:

Possession with intent to distribute, attempted possession with intent to distribute, and conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of cocaine

What Was Done:

Defendant was arrested in undercover operation for possession of two kilograms of cocaine after negotiating purchase.

Unique Approach:

Successfully argued for minimum sentence despite multiple charges and significant drug quantity.

United States v. J.A

Charge: Coercion or Enticement of Minor
Southern District of Florida (Middle District)
2015
Worst Case Scenario:
Life in Prison
Actual Results:
20 Years and supervised release for life, avoiding potential life imprisonment

Arrested For:

Attempted coercion and enticement of minor

What Was Done:

Defendant attempted to solicit a minor for sexual purposes using a dating app. Counsel negotiated plea agreement for twelve years, though judge rejected the negotiated low end of guidelines.

Unique Approach:

Successfully used PSR objections and persuasive arguments to prevent life sentence, despite rejection of initial plea agreement.

United States v. T.R

Charge: Conspiracy to Possess with Intent to Distribute Cocaine
Southern District of Florida (Ft. Pierce)
2014
Worst Case Scenario:
40 Years imprisonment with mandatory minimum of 10 years
Actual Results:
10 Years imprisonment, Modified to: 27 Months with supervised release for a term of 5 months

Arrested For:

Conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of cocaine

What Was Done:

In June 2014, a DEA informant was contacted by an uncharged co-conspirator seeking a cocaine supplier. An undercover detective arranged a meeting with the defendant, who expressed interest in buying cocaine and heroin. Subsequent recorded conversations led to a meeting where the defendant agreed to purchase cocaine and proposed trading other drugs for additional cocaine. On July 11, 2014, the defendant and an accomplice met with undercover detectives to complete the transaction, where the defendant was arrested after attempting to flee.

Unique Approach:

Successfully argued for dramatic sentence reduction from initial 10-year mandatory minimum sentence, demonstrating exceptional negotiation skills in federal drug cases involving mandatory minimums.

United States v. A.R

Charge: Internet Pharmacy Conspiracy
Southern District of New York (Foley Square)
2010-2012
Worst Case Scenario:
Up to 108 years if served consecutively
Actual Results:
Time Served, Supervised Release for 18 months

Arrested For:

Conspiracy to Distribute Narcotics, Narcotics - Sell, Distribute, or Dispense via the Internet, Conspiracy to Commit Misbranding, Money Laundering, Conspiracy to Engage in Structuring

What Was Done:

This indictment involved multiple defendants charged with participating in an illegal internet pharmacy scheme from 2010 to 2012. The scheme involved selling, distributing, and dispensing prescription drugs over the internet without valid prescriptions. Customers ordered drugs like Fioricet, Soma, and Ultram through websites without consulting a physician, making the prescriptions invalid.

Unique Approach:

Successfully negotiated an extraordinary outcome in a complex multi-defendant internet pharmacy case involving serious federal drug and money laundering charges, avoiding decades of potential imprisonment.

United States v. P.N

Charge: Importing/Manufacturing of Firearms
Southern District of Florida (West Palm Beach)
2012
Worst Case Scenario:
10 years imprisonment and 3 years supervised release
Actual Results:
1 year prison and 2 years supervised release

Arrested For:

Making false statements to acquire firearms and international weapons trafficking

What Was Done:

Defendant purchased multiple firearms with intent to traffic to Haiti, making false statements on federal forms. Caught during traffic stop with ten Glock 19 pistols.

Unique Approach:

Successfully negotiated significant reduction in sentence despite international weapons trafficking implications.

United States v. S.A

Charge: Marijuana Distribution
Western District of Texas (El Paso)
2011
Worst Case Scenario:
5 Years imprisonment
Actual Results:
3 years non-reporting probation, 6 months home confinement

Arrested For:

Marijuana Sell/Distribute/Dispense 40 Kilos (88 lbs)

What Was Done:

On November 30, 2011, Border Patrol agents at a checkpoint in Sierra Blanca, Texas, conducted a canine inspection of a vehicle driven by the defendant. The canine alerted to the presence of drugs, leading agents to discover 88 pounds of marijuana concealed in vacuum-sealed bags within the vehicle. The defendant admitted to transporting the marijuana from California to Florida in exchange for money, citing financial hardship as motivation.

Unique Approach:

Successfully argued for probation in lieu of imprisonment despite significant drug quantity (88 pounds), emphasizing client's circumstances and financial hardship in a case involving interstate drug trafficking.

United States v. D.S

Charge: Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud
Southern District of Florida (Miami)
2005
Worst Case Scenario:
20 Years imprisonment
Actual Results:
4 months imprisonment followed by 3 years supervised release

Arrested For:

Participated as a straw buyer in a mortgage fraud scheme involving a property in Miami Beach, Florida

What Was Done:

In July 2005, an individual participated as a straw buyer in a mortgage fraud scheme involving a property in Miami Beach, Florida. Loan applications submitted on their behalf contained materially false information regarding assets, employment, and intentions to occupy the property. The individual did not provide a down payment or intend to live in the property but received payment for their involvement. The scheme resulted in the lender incurring significant losses, with fraud damages exceeding $400,000.

Unique Approach:

Successfully negotiated minimal sentence in complex mortgage fraud case involving substantial financial losses and federal wire transfers across state lines.

United States v. R.J

Charge: Conspiracy to Commit Mail Fraud
Southern District of Illinois (East St. Louis)
2010
Worst Case Scenario:
20 years imprisonment and 3 years release on each count
Actual Results:
46 months imprisonment and 2 years supervised release

Arrested For:

Timeshare resale fraud targeting elderly victims

What Was Done:

Defendant collected over $282,000 from 141 consumers through Creative Vacation Solutions timeshare resale scam, primarily targeting elderly individuals.

Unique Approach:

Successfully mitigated sentence despite aggravating factors of elderly victims and high fraud amount.

United States v. SS

Charge: Conspiracy to Commit Mail Fraud
Southern District of Illinois (East St. Louis)
2009
Worst Case Scenario:
20 years imprisonment and 2 years supervised release
Actual Results:
Initial sentence of 48 months imprisonment reduced to 18 months upon motion to the court, with 2 years supervised release

Arrested For:

Fraudulent telemarketing timeshare resale scheme targeting elderly victims.

What Was Done:

The defendant participated in a complex telemarketing fraud scheme involving false promises, misrepresentations, and deceptive business fronts. The operation used fabricated offers and fees to defraud victims across multiple states.

Unique Approach:

Successfully argued for a sentence reduction motion, demonstrating exceptional post-conviction advocacy.

United States v. JD (Deputy Case)

Charge: Conspiracy to Commit Extortion and Drug Distribution
Southern District of Florida (West Palm Beach)
2008
Worst Case Scenario:
Life imprisonment with 10-year minimum mandatory
Actual Results:
100 months imprisonment with 3 years supervised release

Arrested For:

A Broward County Sheriff's Deputy charged with conspiracy to commit extortion under color of official right and conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine.

What Was Done:

Deputy was accused of providing countersurveillance for a drug transport operation involving 100 kilos of cocaine and receiving $3,000 for their role. Case involved complex undercover FBI operations and recorded conversations.

Unique Approach:

Successfully navigated a high-profile case involving law enforcement corruption and substantial drug quantities, achieving a sentence well below potential life imprisonment.

United States v. R.B

Charge: Possession of Controlled Substance (Oxycodone)
Southern District of Florida (Ft. Lauderdale)
2008
Worst Case Scenario:
20 years imprisonment and 3 years release on each count
Actual Results:
16 months imprisonment and 3 years supervised release

Arrested For:

Possession of Controlled Substance (Sell/Distribute/Dispense) (Oxycodone)

What Was Done:

Multiple defendants charged in conspiracy to possess and distribute oxycodone in Broward County.

Unique Approach:

Successfully negotiated significant reduction in sentence through effective plea negotiations in multi-defendant case.

More Successful Outcomes

A comprehensive view of our track record across federal and state courts

United States v. R.J

Conspiracy to Commit Mail Fraud

Fraud
46 months imprisonment (from potential 20 years)

United States v. E.L

Wire Fraud (4 Counts)

Fraud
34 months imprisonment (from potential 80 years)

United States v. K.H

Possession with Intent to Distribute Cocaine

Drug Crimes
24 months imprisonment, gun charges dropped

United States v. R.M

Coercion or Enticement of Female

Sex Crimes
10 years imprisonment (avoided life sentence)

United States v. S.A

Marijuana Distribution (88 lbs)

Drug Crimes
3 years probation, 6 months home confinement

State v. A.A.S

DUI and DWLS

Traffic
DUI minimums with no jail time
"
Results speak louder than promises. When facing serious charges, you need a defense team with a proven track record of turning worst-case scenarios into favorable outcomes.
Aaron M. Cohen, Esq.
Principal Attorney, AMC Defense Law

Your Case Could Be Our Next Success Story

Don't let criminal charges define your future. With over 30 years of proven results, we know how to fight for the best possible outcome in your case.