When the government investigates an organization or an executive, the advantage goes to the side that knows how federal agents actually build, value, and prove a case. We now bring that perspective in-house — for our own defense work and as a consulting resource for organizations and executives facing federal exposure.
Federal investigations are built, valued, and proven a particular way. Agents follow money, build timelines, value losses, and test theories long before anyone sees an indictment. When the government turns its attention to an organization or an executive, the advantage goes to the side that understands that process from the inside.
We now bring that perspective in-house. Our federal investigations consultant is a former FBI supervisory special agent who is also a Certified Public Accountant (licensed in Ohio and Florida) — a combination of investigative command experience and financial-analysis depth that few defense teams can offer. We apply it to our own defense work and make it available as a consulting resource for organizations and executives facing federal exposure.
Presented in role-based terms — we do not publish the individual's name or any affiliated organization.
A retired FBI supervisory special agent with decades of federal investigative and supervisory experience, having supervised programs spanning money laundering and complex financial crime, asset forfeiture, public corruption, healthcare fraud, white-collar crime, major theft, violent crime, counterintelligence, and counterterrorism.
A Certified Public Accountant, licensed in Ohio and Florida — financial-investigation depth that lets us read the government's loss math, tracing, and forfeiture theories the way its own analysts do.
Additional background includes extensive undercover experience as lead or supervising agent on multiple federal operations, and international experience, including overseas assignments focused on terrorism-finance and cross-border financial matters.
The same instincts that build a federal case can take one apart. We use this capability to pressure-test the government's theory early: where the money actually went, whether the loss figure holds, whether a forfeiture claim can truly trace an asset, and where an internal review needs to look before the government gets there.
For organizations, that often means a credible internal investigation and a proactive compliance review. For executives, it means a clear-eyed pre-charge risk assessment while there is still room to act.
Confidential, and co-counsel friendly. We work alongside your current attorney or compliance team. Every consultation is confidential, and we commit to a prompt response.
If your organization or you personally are under federal scrutiny — or want to get ahead of it — contact AMC Defense Law for a confidential consultation. You can also explore our Federal Sentencing Mitigation & Early Release capability.
An internal investigation is a controlled, privileged review an organization conducts into its own conduct — usually when it learns of possible misconduct, receives a subpoena or whistleblower complaint, or sees signs of a government inquiry. Done well, it lets leadership understand the facts before the government does, preserve privilege, decide whether and how to remediate, and position the organization to respond credibly. Done poorly, it creates new exposure. Our federal investigations consultant evaluates scope, evidence, and risk the way a federal agent would, so the review answers the questions prosecutors will actually ask.
Asset forfeiture is the government's effort to seize money or property it alleges is connected to a crime — often running parallel to, or even ahead of, any criminal charge. It can reach bank accounts, real estate, and business assets, sometimes before a defendant is ever indicted. Forfeiture turns on tracing: whether the government can actually connect a specific asset to alleged unlawful activity. That tracing analysis is a financial question as much as a legal one, which is where investigative and accounting depth matters.
A pre-charge risk assessment is a proactive review — before any charge is filed — of where an organization or executive is exposed under federal law. It looks at the conduct, the documents, the financial trail, and the likely government theories, then identifies what can be remediated, what should be preserved, and where the real risk sits. The pre-charge window is often the most valuable point to engage, because decisions made then shape everything that follows.
No. Much of this work happens before any charge — for organizations under regulatory scrutiny, executives who have received a subpoena or target letter, and companies that want a proactive compliance review. The goal is to understand and reduce exposure early, while there is still room to act.
Sentenced before a Guideline changed? On October 8 the Eleventh Circuit vacated a 204-month Florida sentence over Amendment 832. See if your range is wrong.
Florida ranked second in a 14,748-site med spa menu study. If your site lists GLP-1s, IV drips or testosterone, see what each line tells an investigator.
Two $20 million COVID testing resolutions in eight days. If you billed the HRSA Uninsured Program from Florida, see how a civil review turns criminal, and when.
Own a Florida med spa? Utah's draft bill sets a 60-mile rule for Botox and RN-only injections. See how that same checklist feeds felony charges in Florida.
Medicare was billed $15 million and paid $500,000. If you run a South Florida lab or testing business, that gap is a six-level swing. See how loss is fought.
Prescribing controlled substances by telehealth with no in-person visit? That exception ends December 31, 2026. Audit your 2026 scripts before DEA asks.
A target letter from a United States Attorney's Office means the government has already decided you are someone it wants to prosecute. The investigation is not beginning. It is ending.
Most federal cases are resolved at sentencing, not at trial — making it the single biggest opportunity to change a client's outcome. We bring a dedicated, in-house sentencing strategy to that stage.
Federal healthcare fraud cases are built from claims data before anyone is interviewed. By the time HHS-OIG or FBI agents knock, the government usually has months or years of billing analysis, and often a cooperating insider. The defense has to start where the government started: the data, the medical records that support or undercut medical necessity, and the financial relationships behind the referrals.
Wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1343 is one of the most frequently charged federal crimes, and one of the most flexible tools in a federal prosecutor's toolkit. Any scheme to defraud that uses a wire communication crosses into federal jurisdiction. The penalty is up to 20 years per count.