Home/Practice Areas/Federal Cybercrime
Federal Criminal Defense

Federal Cybercrime Defense

Federal cybercrime charges under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act carry up to 10–20 years per count. If the FBI has executed a search warrant or reached out to you, the investigation is already advanced. You need defense counsel who understands both the law and the technology.

Federal Cybercrime

Federal Cybercrime: Why South Florida Is a Primary Target

The Southern District of Florida sits at the intersection of international finance, global telecommunications, and a massive concentration of financial institutions, making it one of the FBI Cyber Division's most active theaters for federal cybercrime prosecution.

Federal cybercrime cases in SDFL increasingly involve business email compromise, cryptocurrency theft and fraud, ransomware deployment, dark web transactions, and AI-assisted fraud operations. The DOJ Cybercrime Unit has dedicated resources specifically to the Southern District, and cooperation between the FBI Miami Field Office and international law enforcement partners has dramatically shortened investigation timelines.

If federal agents have contacted you, executed a search warrant, or if you know you are connected to an investigation, you are not dealing with a local matter. You are dealing with a federal apparatus that has been building its case before you knew it existed.

The Most Commonly Charged Federal Cybercrime Offenses

Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (18 U.S.C. § 1030) is the foundation of virtually every federal computer crime prosecution. Its scope is breathtaking, any unauthorized access to any internet-connected computer qualifies as a "protected computer." Courts have struggled to define the boundaries of "unauthorized access," and recent Supreme Court jurisprudence in Van Buren v. United States (2021) has narrowed, but not eliminated, the government's reach.

Wire fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343) is stacked on top of CFAA charges whenever financial transactions are involved, which is nearly always. Wire fraud carries up to 20 years per count and is the preferred vehicle for BEC fraud, phishing schemes, and any cybercrime involving a financial institution.

Aggravated identity theft (18 U.S.C. § 1028A) adds a mandatory, non-waivable 2-year consecutive sentence on top of any underlying cybercrime conviction whenever stolen identity credentials were used. Federal prosecutors deploy this charge routinely in hacking and BEC cases to prevent plea bargaining from reducing total prison time.

Cryptocurrency and dark web offenses are an increasingly dominant category in SDFL prosecutions, ranging from Bitcoin mixing and darknet market transactions to NFT fraud and exchange manipulation.

How We Defend Federal Cybercrime Cases

Federal cybercrime defense requires an attorney who understands both the law and the technology. The government's digital forensic evidence is only as reliable as its chain of custody and methodology. We challenge both.

Digital forensics defense. Federal agents use commercial and proprietary tools to extract and interpret data from seized devices. These tools make errors. Metadata can be misread, deleted files misattributed, and IP logs misinterpreted. We retain independent digital forensics experts who can audit the government's methodology and identify errors in their evidence narrative.

CFAA authorization challenges. The critical question in many CFAA cases is whether access was truly "unauthorized." Employees accessing company systems, security researchers, and individuals operating under ambiguous IT permission structures have strong arguments that their access was authorized or exceeded only in technical, not legal, terms. Post-Van Buren, these arguments have increasing legal support.

Search and seizure challenges. Federal cybercrime search warrants are broad, sometimes overbroad. We evaluate every warrant for Fourth Amendment compliance, particularity requirements, and whether the government exceeded its authorization. Suppression of evidence obtained from overbroad digital searches has succeeded in multiple federal circuit courts.

Tracing attribution. In network intrusion cases, the government must prove you conducted the attack, not just that it came from your IP address, your account, or your device. IP addresses can be spoofed, accounts compromised, and devices shared. We scrutinize the technical attribution chain for every weakness.

Frequently Asked Questions

Justice Watch Analysis

Federal Cybercrime Defense · 13 min read

The Insider Is Now the Defendant: What a 70-Month Florida Ransomware Sentence Means for Cybersecurity Professionals

A Florida incident response negotiator received 70 months for selling ransomware victims out. The Hobbs Act theory is now a template for your industry.

Federal Digital Evidence · 13 min read

Your Email Provider Already Searched Your Account: What the Eleventh Circuit's Brillhart Ruling Means for Federal Digital Evidence Cases

Your email provider may have already searched your account and sent a report to federal agents. Here is what the Brillhart ruling means for your case.

Cryptocurrency Enforcement · 13 min read

The FBI Is Coming for Crypto Crime Again. The Next Defendants Will Be Compliance Officers.

The GENIUS Act brings regulated stablecoins into the U.S. financial system — and with them bank-style BSA, SAR, and OFAC obligations tied to criminal penalties. The next federal crypto defendants will not only be scammers. They will include compliance officers, BSA officers, and founders charged for a missed filing or a misread sanction.

Federal Cybercrime Enforcement · 12 min read

The "You're Invited" Phishing Wave: Federal Charges Behind Fake Invitation Scams

Federal phishing charges carry 20 years per count plus mandatory consecutive time. If agents called about an invitation scam, contact counsel before indictment.

Federal Criminal Defense · 10 min read

Supreme Court Rules Geofence Warrants Are a Search: What Chatrie Means for Florida Criminal Cases and Your Location Data

On June 29, 2026, the Supreme Court held 6-3 in Chatrie v. United States that geofence warrants are a Fourth Amendment search. The government can no longer treat location data as free for the taking. Here is what the decision means for Florida federal defense.

Federal Money Laundering | Cryptocurrency Enforcement · 14 min read

Can You Go to Prison for Moving Money for Someone Else? Lessons from a $97 Million Crypto Laundering Sentence

A Washington man who never pitched a single investor received five years in federal prison for routing $97.1 million in fraud proceeds through 81 bank accounts and cryptocurrency exchanges. His name was on the accounts. That was enough.

Read all Justice Watch articles